By Dr. Alan Greenspan, Senior Economic Advisor

Gresham’s law is a monetary principle named after Sir Thomas Gresham. It is colloquially simplified to “bad money drives out good”. This was the jest of the argument Sir Gresham presented to Queen Elizabeth I to explain the poor state of England’s coinage following the “Great Debasement” under King Henry VIII. During this period, the purity of gold and silver coins produced by the English mint steadily declined by order of the Crown in an attempt to increase revenues. Once the lower purity of the new (bad) coins was discovered, the old (good) coins of higher purity disappeared from circulation as people chose to spend the lower quality coins in market transactions and hoard the higher quality coins as a store of value – bad money had driven out the good. By the time Queen Elizabeth I ascended to the throne, the secret was out and even foreign merchants were refusing to accept payment in the debased currency.

A similar response to currency debasement was observed in the United States some four hundred years later. In response to a shortage of coins coupled with depleted government silver stocks, the Coinage Act of 1965 reduced the silver content of the U.S. half-dollar coin from 90% to 40%. In accordance with Gresham’s law, the higher purity coins quickly disappeared from circulation. Furthermore, when the price of silver subsequently reached a level at which the silver content in the 40% coin was worth more than their nominal 50-cent face value, those coins disappeared from circulation as well and the U.S. mint abandoned including any silver in half-dollar coins shortly thereafter. Even the lower quality 40% half-dollars had been driven out by worse money – Federal Reserve Notes.

When the U.S. dollar was first anointed the world’s reserve currency by the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944, it was fully backed by gold. Now that the global financial system has transitioned fully to fiat currencies, examples of Gresham’s law in its traditional formulation are rare. No longer are there difference in intrinsic (commodity) value causing one currency to be favored over another. However, foreign exchange rates do reflect some of the forces Gresham originally recognized at work. The present strength in the U.S. dollar in relation to the other traditional reserve currencies is one example of market participants choosing to hoard what they view as “good money” – or at least better money.

Through the prism of Gresham’s law, the strength in the dollar is largely the result of drastically diverging monetary policies. The Federal Reserve has embarked on an expedited rate hike schedule, and this alone would tend to produce a strengthening in the dollar. However, the Fed’s actions are even more dramatic when you look at what the central banks of the other reserve currencies are doing. The Bank of Japan has committed to maintaining ultra-low rates – their target short-term rate is negative at the moment and the target rate on their 10yr bonds is 0%. Europe is also behind the U.S. with respect to the tightening cycle having just brought their target rate to neutral in July and now sitting at a meager 1.5%. By comparison, the Federal Reserve is expected to raise their target rate to 4% at this week’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The Federal Reserve’s commitment to tamping down inflation has convinced markets that the value of their dollar holdings will not be inflated away as quickly as compared to these other reserve currencies and U.S. dollar strength is a symptom of market participants choosing to hoard the “good money”.

Even if, as some prognosticators expect, U.S. inflation crests in the first half of 2023 and the Federal Reserve can slow or even stop the pace of rate increases, the U.S. dollar will still have a monetary tailwind to support it. Indeed, the elephant in the room with respect to continued strength in the U.S. dollar going forward may turn out to be the $95 billion per month reduction in the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. By contrast, the European Central Bank (ECB), who also has a near-$9 trillion balance sheet, recently indicated it has no plans to begin reducing its holdings. Meanwhile in London, former prime minister Liz Truss’ belated fiscal plan shocked markets so much that the Bank of England had to step in and buy government bonds to preserve financial market stability – they are essentially engaging in quantitative easing as the U.S. is tightening. The fact that the supply of U.S. dollars can be expected to steadily decrease makes it a better store of value – that the pound sterling and euro are both flirting with dollar parity is a clear example of investors dumping “bad money”.

To be sure, other factors are also at play. War in Ukraine and the massive uncertainty that it continues to generate in energy and other commodity markets, not to mention geopolitics, is supportive of a the safe-haven dollar. But even if this exogenous shock were to be resolved, the divergences in monetary policy would cause dollar strength to persist for some time. Furthermore, investors should be aware that while dollar strength can be a symptom of economic stresses, it can also be a cause. As the global reserve currency, many of the world’s most important commodities are priced in dollars – in particular energy. Strength in the dollar has made the natural gas Europe so desperately needs that much more expensive. Emerging market economies that rely on imports of dollar-denominated commodities or hold dollar-denominated debt would experience an influx of inflation coupled with rising debt service costs. Absent price increases in their foreign markets, U.S. multinational corporations would experience deflated overseas earnings as the dollar value of foreign sales would shrink with a rising dollar. Take heed, Gresham’s law can wreak havoc on currencies, and the underlying economies will eventually feel the consequences.

The foregoing content reflects the opinions of Advisors Capital Management, LLC and is subject to change at any time without notice. Content provided herein is for informational purposes only and should not be used or construed as investment advice or a recommendation regarding the purchase or sale of any security. There is no guarantee that the statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Indices are not available for direct investment. Any investor who attempts to mimic the performance of an index would incur fees and expenses which would reduce returns. Securities investing involves risk, including the potential for loss of principal. There is no assurance that any investment plan or strategy will be successful.

Share with your network

Shares

About the Author

Dr. Alan Greenspan

Dr. Alan Greenspan

Alan Greenspan served five terms as chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from August 11, 1987, when he was first appointed by President Ronald Reagan. His last term ended on January 31, 2006. He was...
About the Author

Categories

Archives